<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is AT&amp;T U-Verse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.highspeedexperts.com/what-is-att-u-verse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.highspeedexperts.com/what-is-att-u-verse/</link>
	<description>High Speed Internet News, Reviews, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:33:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.highspeedexperts.com/what-is-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highspeedexperts.com/?p=202#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>If Uverse uses fiber optic cable to provide faster speeds, when the signal gets to the house and has to transition to copper it seems to me the speed will have to slow back down. If my understanding is correct, then I don&#039;t see any benefit to Uverse.  If I&#039;m wrong, I hope somebody will explain it to me at my email addy.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Uverse uses fiber optic cable to provide faster speeds, when the signal gets to the house and has to transition to copper it seems to me the speed will have to slow back down. If my understanding is correct, then I don&#8217;t see any benefit to Uverse.  If I&#8217;m wrong, I hope somebody will explain it to me at my email addy.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rose</title>
		<link>http://www.highspeedexperts.com/what-is-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 03:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.highspeedexperts.com/?p=202#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>While you may be able to record 4 programs at once with their whole home DVR, if you want to use it in any other rooms you still have to have a receiver in each room. That is an additional cost for each receiver of about $7.00. I like my option better with my provider/employer DISH Network. With DISH you can get their award winning Dual-tuner DVR and have the DVR availability in 2 rooms without any additional receiver fees. This way I save money and can enjoy my DVR in multiple rooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you may be able to record 4 programs at once with their whole home DVR, if you want to use it in any other rooms you still have to have a receiver in each room. That is an additional cost for each receiver of about $7.00. I like my option better with my provider/employer DISH Network. With DISH you can get their award winning Dual-tuner DVR and have the DVR availability in 2 rooms without any additional receiver fees. This way I save money and can enjoy my DVR in multiple rooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

